The comparative advantage lies in the fact that all countries will always benefit from cooperation and participation in free trade. Popularly attributed to the English economist David Ricardo and his 1817 book “Principles of Political Economy and Taxation,” the Comparative Advantage Act refers to a country`s ability to produce goods and provide services at a lower cost than other countries. The comparative advantage shares many of the characteristics of globalization, the theory that opening up trade in the world will improve living standards in all countries. With the increasing ease with which Mexico can import food from the United States, the role of Mexican farmers is overwhelmed by the production of American agriculture. This is a remarkable Con of ALEFTA. According to Thomas Net Industry Market Trends, more than one million Mexican farmers have lost their jobs as a result of the agreement. If there is free trade and tariffs and quotas are abolished, monopolies will also be abolished because more players will be able to enter the market and join the market. While free trade and the impact of tariffs on the global economy are a hot button, they are hardly new concerns or problems that the United States is dealing with for the first time. In 1994, the United States, Mexico and Canada implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), one of the world`s first and largest free trade agreements. The three nations agreed to reduce tariffs and other barriers. More than two decades later, proponents and opponents of free trade are still debating the pros and cons of free trade, as well as the specific pros and cons of free trade agreements such as NAFTA. Assessing the value of NAFTA is not a simple or simple question.

However, many experts believe that free trade agreements are a necessity for the United States when competing in an increasingly globalized world. Free trade agreements are concluded by two or more countries that want to seal economic cooperation between them and agree on each other`s trade conditions. In the agreement, Member States expressly state tariffs and tariffs, of which tariff A is a form of tax levied on imported goods or services. Tariffs are a common element of international trade. Priority targets to impose on Member States in terms of imports and exports. A better solution than protectionism is to include rules in trade agreements that protect against inconvenience. Opponents of free trade often say that this encourages companies to travel to countries with poor environmental and labour rules. These measures could potentially lead to systematic labour abuse and environmental destruction. For example, a coal company in the United States could pay a high minimum wage to workers, adopt aggressive safety measures and protect local rivers from pollution. Free trade agreements could allow the mining company to relocate its operations to a country without these rules, which could allow it to reduce costs by endangering workers and the environment. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a 1994 agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico that lifted numerous restrictions on the import and export of agricultural products between these three countries. Some of these policies came into force immediately after the agreement, while others came into force for 15 years to implement them.